I was thinkin I should post my recent thoughts and theory but then I saw all the other post I didnt put up.
Ive put them up and down so much. because I was afraid of what others would think of me. or If i said all these theorys and then when the time came they actually dont come into existance and I am made to look like a fool ( im not risking being wrong just because Im afraid of the Will power of others). you know what I just dont care, Im here help people, not appear as a Idol like jesus did with his perfection. nope... sadly people try to be perfect and they dont know understand what perfect is or the real reason they really strive to be perfection.
that was not put into words correctly but no matter
this is mostly just a little side note.
oh yeah, I read up on this fascinating woman named Helena Blavatsky, and I think im a theosophist, but still retain the morals and beliefs of other religions, I need to figure out my own name for my way of life that encompases MY beliefs since they are blended with all and cant be labled with anything of existance that I know of.
I dont mean making a new religion cause thats not what I want to do because religion tells people that their god/ways are right and all others are wrong,
people use a rule for how they live their life, one of the best but missinterpretable is the golden rule. because it could be used as a rule for selfish reasons such as that If you give to someone you should expect for them to give to you, then you are dissapointed with the results of others morals and you throw away yours for the morals of others around you because its more comfortable because IT actually works and is based on how the world works in its current state, which is not a good one.
but If you view the golden rule with optimism and faith that just because you give to someone and they dont give back doesnt mean you dont gain something else.... such as good will to others and unconditional love ( where the act of expressing love to others is rewarding enough, and everything else is just gravy)
see my dilemia?! no matter what something may stand for you can still have the uneducated masses missinterpret its true meaning...
the kind of knowedge that I have is not meant for the uneducated masses.
so I was reading upon old masters who knew what I know now , aristotle, plato, socrates, jesus, buddah, nostradamus, and SOO many others that became the old masters that you hear of in stories with the long beards that asked questions to stir the truth in others so that they realize it for themselves and know that it is true...... gandolf, hahaha merlin, shittt...
wise men..
and they would tell me the information I needed to know( ofcourse in parabols that I could clearly see) but only because I understood the ways of spirit.
I was learning more on astrology and was looking for people that had the same astrological problems as I do and used their wisdom to help me figure out what I should do. and I saw this written by Helena Blavatsky...
Section 5
THE FUNDAMENTAL TEACHINGS OF THEOSOPHY
ENQUIRER. But why, in that case, do Buddhism and Christianity represent the two opposite poles of such belief?
THEOSOPHIST. Because the conditions under which they were preached were not the same. In India the Brahmins, jealous of their superior knowledge, and excluding from it every caste save their own, had driven millions of men into idolatry and almost fetishism. Buddha had to give the death-blow to an exuberance of unhealthy fancy and fanatical superstition resulting from ignorance, such as has rarely been known before or after. Better a philosophical atheism than such ignorant worship for those --
"Who cry upon their gods and are not heard,
Or are not heeded --"
and who live and die in mental despair. He had to arrest first of all this muddy torrent of superstition, to uproot errors before he gave out the truth. And as he could not give out all for the same good reason as Jesus, who reminds his disciples that the Mysteries of Heaven are not for the unintelligent masses, but for the elect alone, and therefore "spake he to them in parables" (Matt. xiii. 11) -- so his caution led Buddha to conceal too much. He even refused to say to the monk Vacchagotta whether there was, or was not an Ego in man. When pressed to answer, "the Exalted one maintained silence." (5)
